By ignoring pretty much all bilateral accords and international laws and conventions on the traditional global laws involving Trans-boundary Waterways and Lakes, India has made the decision unilaterally to construct Tipaimukh Dam intended for “so-called hydro-electricity” on the Barak River in its north-eastern Manipur state; without thinking about the unfavorable affect the Dam would produce upon environmental surroundings and also bio-diversity of the lower riparian Bangladesh. If India desires to create suggested the Tipaimukh Dam unilaterally in infringement of the key points of equity, fairness without damages policy to Bangladesh, then Bangladesh will be entitled to wage a major international legal war towards India before the International Court of Justice to refrain India from constructing such Dam on the Barak River.
Aspen Technology, Inc., a prominent vendor of software and services to the process industries, declared that on Jan nine, 2012, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas placed a final judgment and everlasting injunction in litigation brought by AspenTech against a past AspenTech individual, Dr. Tekin Kunt, for violations of Dr. Kunt’s privacy along with non-competition contract with AspenTech, in the claim entitled Aspen Technology, Inc. v Tekin A. Kunt and M3 Technology, Inc. AspenTech continues to maintain claims in this litigation in opposition to M3 Technology, Inc., Dr. Kunt’s previous employer, which includes claims for copyright laws infringement and also misappropriation of industry secrets in relation to AspenTech’s proprietary software package.
Inside the Phillipines, House prosecutors on Thursday requested senator-judges to call for Chief Justice Renato Corona and members of his family to testify in front of the Impeachment Court and present records on at least 45 real property possessions found to be owned by the Coronas in several parts of Metro Manila. Besides the Chief Justice, the prosecutors additionally asked for the Impeachment Court, chaired by Senate, President Juan Ponce Enrile, to issue separate subpoenas for his spouse, Cristina R. Corona, his daughter Carla Corona-Castillo, son-in-law Constantino Castillo III, Francis R. Corona and Charina R. Corona who were known as titleholders in the LRA docs given to the Senate.
Within a new courtroom decision, an insurance broker, Ms. Arnold, for Opponent Mutual of Omaha, just after terminating her contract with Opponent, sued for past due employee entitlements within the Labor Code. Arnold believed that this contract she acquired entered into with Mutual had erroneously deemed her as an independent contractor, and that under applicable law she was in truth a worker. Arnold appealed, saying that the actual trial courtroom erred in concluding that the common law test regarding employment had been relevant, instead of the much wider statutory definition of worker under Labor Rule section 2750.